Hanoi (VNS/VNA) - Experts have called on the Ministry ofFinance to be considerate and transparent with their plan to spend theenvironmental protection tax applied on gasoline, which they have just proposedto double.

The Ministry of Finance is drafting an amendment to the law onenvironmental protection tax. It suggests lifting the tax on gasoline from thecurrent 1,000-4,000 VND to 3,000-8,000 VND per litre.

Higher tax rates for other fuel products, such as diesel and fueloil, are also proposed in the draft amendment.

Should the new tax rate be applied, the price of gasoline willrise to more than 22,000 VND (roughly 1 USD) a litre, according to analysts.

Some experts and lawmakers say the hike would hurt people’s dailylives and Vietnamese gas production.

Tran Ngoc Vinh, NA deputy from Hai Phong city, said environmentalprotection is a necessary task, but it cannot be based on taxation.

“Most people use personal vehicles when traveling to work, a hikein gasoline prices would be a burden for them,” Vinh said.

Ngo Tri Long, former head of the Ministry of Finance’s PriceManagement Institute, said that the proposed ceiling rate is so high that itwill surely affect the market in general, Long added.

“Moreover, it’s irrational if the Government tries to collect taxto make up for budget mismanagement, and it’s absolutely a bad thing for thewhole economy,” Long said.

Previously, the Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry expressedconcerns about the negative impact the new tax rate will have on the economy.

Dau Anh Tuan, head of VCCI’s Legal Division, said the proposedenvironment tax hike would hurt enterprises and the economy, since fuels are animportant input for the transport, agriculture and seafood sectors.

Pham Dinh Thi, director of the ministry’s Tax Policy, saidgasoline contains chemicals that adversely affect the environment. It istherefore subject to special consumption taxes and environmental protectiontaxes with different names around the world.

However, Ngo Tri Long said the most important thing istransparency in spending the environmental protection tax revenue.

“In 2016 the total collection of environmental tax was 40 trillionVND (1.7 billion USD) but we spent only 10 trillion VND (440 million USD). Thatmeans we haven’t used up the fund, why do we need to increase the tax rate?” hesaid.

Moreover, he said the tax is often set as a percentage of a good’sprice, but in this case the tax was set at too rigid a number.

“That means that whatever the price of gasoline, the tax willalways be 4,000 VND, or 8,000 VND. Why? It’s unusual,” he said.

Nguyen Quang Thai from the Vietnam Economics Science Association,wondered about tax collection.

“Will it stand as a separate fund or will it all go the statebudget? If it is for the environment protection causes, it must be spent on theenvironment” he said.

“This must be clear so that even if the tax is increased, peoplecan still accept it,” he said, adding that he doubted that the NationalAssembly would pass such proposal.

Responding these opinions, Thi, head of the Department of Tax Policies,emphasised the ratio of 1 percent budget collection spent on environmentalprotection was just direct expenditure, not including indirect expenditure.

“The environmental protection tax is collected according to theState Budget Law and spent according to the State Budget Law, not that therevenue from the environmental protection tax is only used for environmentalprotection,” he said.

Therefore, “it is impossible to say the environmental protectiontax is spent less than collected and used not for the right purpose.”

However, such answer was not satisfactory to some.

Bui Thi An, an NA deputy from Hanoi, said more information needsto be announced.

“It’s necessary to say upon what foundation such tax figures wereproposed. How much do we need to make the air clean? How specifically willthese tax revenues be spent?” she said.

An added that it has been more than a year since the environmentalprotection tax was increased from 1,000 VND to3,000 VND, but no report has beenannounced on the spending of those funds.

Nguyen Xuan Phuong, a resident of Hoan Kiem district, said if thetax will be strictly and seriously used to improve the environment, then he’sall in for it.

“I can say I, and many people, would be more than willing to paythe proposed tax if it is spent effectively on our environment,” he said.-VNA